|Date: ||Wed, 8 Dec 1999 16:46:19 -0500|
|Reply-To: ||Walter Davis <walter_davis@UNC.EDU>|
|Sender: ||"SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>|
|From: ||Walter Davis <walter_davis@UNC.EDU>|
|Organization: ||The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill|
|Subject: ||Re: confusing MIXED test results|
|Content-Type: ||text/plain; charset=us-ascii|
Stan Wheeler wrote:
> This probably won't be much help but, by any chance, did the
> student specify Type 1 F-tests ?
yeah, I thought of that, but no he didn't. And if he had, it's unlikely
the dummy main effect p-values would have matched. I'll see about
posting the data.
> Also, I think that random intercept is the same as CS so I'd try
> rerunning with
> repeated / type=cs subject=group;
> in place of the random statement just to see if I got the same result.
we'll give that a try.
Walter Davis firstname.lastname@example.org
Health Data Analyst
Odum Institute for Research in Social Science ph: (919) 962-1019
UNC - Chapel Hill fax: (919) 962-8980