|Date: ||Thu, 21 Oct 1999 16:56:40 -0700|
|Reply-To: ||"Berryhill, Tim" <TWB2@PGE.COM>|
|Sender: ||"SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>|
|From: ||"Berryhill, Tim" <TWB2@PGE.COM>|
|Subject: ||Re: recruiter overhead/hrly rates|
Although I am a contract production programmer, the idea is absurd.
Contractors should do new development or emergency fire fighting, then be
let go (whether they are replaced by an employee or not).
> From: Edwards, Ellen[SMTP:ellen.edwards@ATTWS.COM]
> Reply To: Edwards, Ellen
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 1999 2:19 PM
> To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Re: recruiter overhead/hrly rates
> Charles...this could be a very interesting topic indeed! I, for one, am
> very interested in learning more. I haven't independently consulted since
> about 1994, and have no idea what the "going" rate is, what's fair, etc.
> Also, I would like to hear about how the "market" is for consultants these
> days. I have been seeing companies hiring full-time and letting their
> consultants go (my last two assignments). Is this the current trend?