LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 1999, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 1999 16:56:40 -0700
Reply-To:   "Berryhill, Tim" <TWB2@PGE.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   "Berryhill, Tim" <TWB2@PGE.COM>
Subject:   Re: recruiter overhead/hrly rates
Comments:   To: "Edwards, Ellen" <ellen.edwards@ATTWS.COM>
Content-Type:   text/plain

Although I am a contract production programmer, the idea is absurd. Contractors should do new development or emergency fire fighting, then be let go (whether they are replaced by an employee or not).

> ---------- > From: Edwards, Ellen[SMTP:ellen.edwards@ATTWS.COM] > Reply To: Edwards, Ellen > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 1999 2:19 PM > To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: recruiter overhead/hrly rates > > Charles...this could be a very interesting topic indeed! I, for one, am > very interested in learning more. I haven't independently consulted since > about 1994, and have no idea what the "going" rate is, what's fair, etc. > > Also, I would like to hear about how the "market" is for consultants these > days. I have been seeing companies hiring full-time and letting their > consultants go (my last two assignments). Is this the current trend? >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page