LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 1999, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 25 Aug 1999 03:49:19 +0100
Reply-To:     John Whittington <medisci@POWERNET.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         John Whittington <medisci@POWERNET.COM>
Subject:      Re: Missing Values (... not so fast!)
Comments: To: Peter Flom <peter.flom@NDRI.ORG>
In-Reply-To:  <199908241843.TAA13319@mail-relay.power.net.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 14:47 24/08/99 -0400, Peter Flom wrote:

>With regard to missing data on surveys, we also need to >distinguish "missing because of deliberate skip", e.g. >we don't ask people with no kids how old their kids are.

Yes, of course - and this is obviously one of those situations in which coding missing ('missing because not applicable') as numerical zero would have disastrous effects on summary data.

>But even this can get complicated. In our research, we ask a lot of sensitive >questions about things like use of illicit drugs. We ask about these in >several ways. So, a person who says to the question "Have you ever used >cocaine?" on one section will then not be asked "How old were you when >you first used cocaine?"

Yes, as I need not tell you, there are many approaches that can be taken to those sort of questions. Some people believe that one sometimes gets most honest answers by not asking the 'filter' question ('have you ever used ...?) at all. In my previous life as a physician, I was certainly taught to take this approach when trying to get fairly honest information about consumption of alcohol, tobacco, illicit drugs, food or whatever, or questions about sexual activity etc. - the idea being to almost give the impression that one is expecting a 'positive' answer, so as to reduce hesitance or embarrassment. Hence, one might ask how much someone smokes, without first asking them *whether* they smoke - or ask a patient how many extra-marital sexual partners they have had, rather than 'whether'.

However, this has precious little to do with SAS!

Regards,

John

---------------------------------------------------------------- Dr John Whittington, Voice: +44 (0) 1296 730225 Mediscience Services Fax: +44 (0) 1296 738893 Twyford Manor, Twyford, E-mail: medisci@powernet.com Buckingham MK18 4EL, UK mediscience@compuserve.com ----------------------------------------------------------------


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page