LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 1999, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 7 May 1999 10:42:49 +0200
Reply-To:     Nya Alison <NAlison@CNX-GLOBAL.CH>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Nya Alison <NAlison@CNX-GLOBAL.CH>
Subject:      Re: SAS Institute - Sanity vs. Insanity
Comments: To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.VT.EDU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Having had a recent experience of the business ethics of the SAS Institute I would venture an opinion that probably equal opportunity in the top echelons of a private company is harder to achieve. I believe this is because public companies have statutory and legal obligations to the public, therefore there is at least a standard of public scrutiny and accountability as regards company policy, because the directors have a liability to the shareholders, and must report to them. In small private companies, market forces dictate that standards of business behaviour are in line with large companies. In wealthy private companies, the direct economic pressure to conform is correspondingly less. Regards Nya Nya Alison Murray PC Analysis Services http://www.qldnet.com.au


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page