I also like, "Avoid the .0 version of anything."
Since we hope to skip 7.x, I am waiting for 8.1.
Tim Berryhill - Contract Programmer and General Wizard
TWB2@PGE.COM or http://www.aartwolf.com/twb.html
Frequently at Pacific Gas & Electric Co., San Francisco
The correlation coefficient between their views and
my postings is slightly less than 0
> From: Jack N Shoemaker[SMTP:shoe@WORLD.STD.COM]
> Reply To: Jack N Shoemaker
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 6:22 PM
> To: SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Re: V7 Bug: ODBC Date Error
> A wise person (was it Ian?) once wrote: only trust the even-numbered
> versions. Think about it. 6.03 vs 6.04, 6.07 vs 6.08, 6.11 vs 6.12.
> Morale of the story: Wait for 8. - Jack
> Mike Davenport <Mike.Davenport@RICHMOND.PPDI.COM> writes:
> > Yet one more reason my production version is still 6.12.
> > > There's a well-documented bug in how Version 7 ODBC under WinNT
> > > handles null dates. SAS knows about this bug and has fix for it on
> > > website.