I also like, "Avoid the .0 version of anything."

Since we hope to skip 7.x, I am waiting for 8.1.

Tim Berryhill - Contract Programmer and General Wizard TWB2@PGE.COM or http://www.aartwolf.com/twb.html Frequently at Pacific Gas & Electric Co., San Francisco The correlation coefficient between their views and my postings is slightly less than 0 > ---------- > From: Jack N Shoemaker[SMTP:shoe@WORLD.STD.COM] > Reply To: Jack N Shoemaker > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 6:22 PM > To: SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: V7 Bug: ODBC Date Error > > A wise person (was it Ian?) once wrote: only trust the even-numbered > versions. Think about it. 6.03 vs 6.04, 6.07 vs 6.08, 6.11 vs 6.12. > Morale of the story: Wait for 8. - Jack > > Mike Davenport <Mike.Davenport@RICHMOND.PPDI.COM> writes: > > > > > Yet one more reason my production version is still 6.12. <SNIP> > > > There's a well-documented bug in how Version 7 ODBC under WinNT > > > handles null dates. SAS knows about this bug and has fix for it on > their > > > website. <SNIP>