Date:         Fri, 28 May 1999 18:33:04 -0400
Reply-To:     CICS List <CICS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
Sender:       CICS List <CICS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Lynn J. Hong" <lhong@TECHNOLOGIST.COM>
Subject:      Re: RENTPGM=PROTECT & Xpediter/CICS
Content-Type: Text/Plain

We have RENTPGM=NOPROTECT in development regions.  We are Xpediter users.  The problem is that we don't find out the bad code until they get to our QA regions where we have RENTPGM=PROTECT.  This is such a show stopper  when we upgraded CICS from V3 to V4 in the QA regions.  Everything checked out in test regions and failed in QA.  The applications have to be retested and corrected to iron out those problems.  You know the rest of the story...
 
Lynn Hong
 
 
 ---- you wrote:
> Does anyone have any experiences to share (good, bad, or indifferent) on
> using the Xpediter/CICS  subsystem to allow setting breakpoints in programs
> residing in (E)RDSA?  Or are the Xpediter users out there not using
> RENTPGM=NOPROTECT in development regions or not at all?  Or not linking RENT
> if setting breakpoints?
>
> Thanks,
> Scott Trost
> trosts@schneider.com
>
 
 
-----------------------------------------------------
Get free personalized email at http://email.lycos.com