LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (February 1999, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 9 Feb 1999 17:55:23 +0000
Reply-To:     John Whittington <medisci@POWERNET.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         John Whittington <medisci@POWERNET.COM>
Subject:      Re: Response about Output Window Full
Comments: To: "Berryhill, Timothy" <TWB2@PGE.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 08:54 09/02/99 -0800, Berryhill, Timothy wrote:

>The last time I tried to run a regression with subjects who might be >distinctly different in their behavior, rather than run many regressions I >used a BY statement. This may not be appropriate in this example, but it >sure sounds like it to me.

Tim - that sounds like a close variant of what I posted earlier today - and, from what he's said, I suspect that probably *is* what Jie Qin is doing. A BY statement does, of course, still result in 'many separate regressions being undertaken' - but the performance advantage is between this (in a single PROC step) and having thousands of separate PROC runs!

Of course, there might actually be an argument for doing it all in one glorious great analysis!

Regards,

John

---------------------------------------------------------------- Dr John Whittington, Voice: +44 (0) 1296 730225 Mediscience Services Fax: +44 (0) 1296 738893 Twyford Manor, Twyford, E-mail: medisci@powernet.com Buckingham MK18 4EL, UK mediscience@compuserve.com ----------------------------------------------------------------


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page