LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 1998)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 11 Dec 1998 16:23:22 GMT0BST
Reply-To:     PAUL MCGEOGHAN <Mcgeoghan@CARDIFF.AC.UK>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         PAUL MCGEOGHAN <Mcgeoghan@CARDIFF.AC.UK>
Subject:      kruskal-wallis test v7.5 and v8

Hi,

When I compare the results of a Kruskal-Wallis k independent samples test in SPSS 6.1 to that in SPSS 7.5 OR 8, I get different results. SPSS 6.1 gives you the significance of the Kruskal-Wallis 1-way anova corrected for ties yet SPSS 7.5 and SPSS 8 do not.

Can anyone tell me what the difference is or how the Kruskal-Wallis is calculated differently in versions 7.5 and 8?

As an example, take the Bank.sav dataset and use SALNOW as dependent variable and sexrace (1,4) as grouping variable. In SPSS 6.1, I get Chi-Square 175.0541 and Chi-Square 175.0681 corrected for ties yet in SPSS 7.5 OR 8, I get 203.326 for the Chi-Square value. Also, the mean ranks are different.

Obviously the formula has changed?

Thanks, Paul

----------------------------------------------- Paul McGeoghan (Statistics and databases support) Information Services University of Wales College of Cardiff Tel (01222) 874875 Ext 5035


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page