|Date: ||Thu, 5 Nov 1998 13:02:53 -0500|
|Sender: ||"SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>|
|From: ||Innis Sande <isande@NOTES.CC.BELLCORE.COM>|
|Subject: ||Re: SAS history|
|Content-type: ||text/plain; charset=us-ascii|
Have you tried Splus?
Tom Abernathy <tga1@COLUMBIA.EDU> on 10/30/98 03:15:13 PM
Please respond to Tom Abernathy <tga1@COLUMBIA.EDU>
cc: (bcc: Innis Sande/Bellcore)
Subject: Re: SAS history
BMDP is intuitive and easy to follow?
It all depends on what you learned on.
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Anthony F. Badalamenti wrote:
> SAS is not an easy package to use for most people. Its notation is
> difficult and its documentation obscure.
> Can anyone shed light on the history behind this?
> As a comparison, the same of Statistica and BMDP are intutiive and easy
> to follow.
> TIA -- Tony Badalamenti
- Tom Abernathy (firstname.lastname@example.org)