| Date: | Thu, 5 Nov 1998 13:02:53 -0500 |
|---|
| Reply-To: | isande@NOTES.CC.BELLCORE.COM |
|---|
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU> |
|---|
| From: | Innis Sande <isande@NOTES.CC.BELLCORE.COM> |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: SAS history |
|---|
| Content-type: | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
|---|
Have you tried Splus?
Tom Abernathy <tga1@COLUMBIA.EDU> on 10/30/98 03:15:13 PM
Please respond to Tom Abernathy <tga1@COLUMBIA.EDU>
To: SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU
cc: (bcc: Innis Sande/Bellcore)
Subject: Re: SAS history
Huh ?
BMDP is intuitive and easy to follow?
It all depends on what you learned on.
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Anthony F. Badalamenti wrote:
> SAS is not an easy package to use for most people. Its notation is
> difficult and its documentation obscure.
>
> Can anyone shed light on the history behind this?
>
> As a comparison, the same of Statistica and BMDP are intutiive and easy
> to follow.
>
> TIA -- Tony Badalamenti
>
>
>
- Tom Abernathy (tga1@columbia.edu)
| 
