| Date: | Sat, 17 Jan 1998 10:22:35 -0700 |
| Reply-To: | ALBERT BEAULNE <A.BEAULNE@V-WAVE.COM> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | ALBERT BEAULNE <A.BEAULNE@V-WAVE.COM> |
| Organization: | Videotron Communications Ltd. |
| Subject: | weighting to reflect exposure |
|---|
I would like to hear what approaches have been employed to weight cases when
cases and groups have different
exposures to a condition.
Our Example
We have 1,900 patients for whom we have recorded the admissions to hospital,
emergency and ambulatory clinics
Each record in the file is an admission (some patients can have multiple
records)
There are two time periods
Exposure in this case refers to the individual being in the community (Time
1) or a Continuing Care Centre (Time 2)
and potentially entering the Acute care health system.
Time
Period 1 - Jan, 01, 1995 to admission to Continuing Care (any time after Jan
01, 1996 to Nov 31, 1997)
Period 2 - From Continuing Care Admission date to Discharge Date from
Continuing Care or Nov 31, 1997 if not discharged
Thus each exposure period could be different for each case and each case
could have different exposure times in the two periods
Thus if the question was do individuals enter acute care more often
when in the community as opposed to Continuing Care
one would have to adjust for the time exposed to both conditions
i.e. if you were in the community for 2 months and in continuing care 1
month
and if you had 2 admissions while in community and 1 while in continuing
care then this would be non-significant
My question is would you weight at the individual level or would you total
the incidents in each period and total the number of days in each period and
then adjust
i.e. we know that the sum of ratios is not equal to the ration of sums
(unless all denominators are the same)
|