| Date: | Mon, 15 Sep 1997 21:07:47 -0700 |
|---|
| Reply-To: | "kmself@ix.netcom.com" <kmself@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU> |
|---|
| From: | "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@IX.NETCOM.COM> |
|---|
| Organization: | Self Analysis |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: SAS Code vs. SQL Code |
|---|
|
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
|---|
Ian Whitlock of the Westat recently requested opinions on this subject and
posted a summary to SAS-L. You might look for it in the archives or via
an USENET search engine (keywords: sas whitlock sql).
The general answer is: your mileage will vary. SQL is yet another tool
to use.
On Sunday, June 01, 1997 4:53 PM, Hoang, Hien [SMTP:hien_hoang@AFCC.COM]
wrote:
> Can someone tell me if SAS Code is more efficient than SQL code or
> vice-versa? I have a feeling this efficiency issue depends on the
> scenario but I'm not sure.
>
> Thanks,
> Hien
Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com)
What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?
| 
