|Date: ||Mon, 15 Sep 1997 21:07:47 -0700|
|Reply-To: ||"email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Sender: ||"SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>|
|From: ||"Karsten M. Self" <kmself@IX.NETCOM.COM>|
|Organization: ||Self Analysis|
|Subject: ||Re: SAS Code vs. SQL Code|
|Content-Type: ||text/plain; charset="us-ascii"|
Ian Whitlock of the Westat recently requested opinions on this subject and
posted a summary to SAS-L. You might look for it in the archives or via
an USENET search engine (keywords: sas whitlock sql).
The general answer is: your mileage will vary. SQL is yet another tool
On Sunday, June 01, 1997 4:53 PM, Hoang, Hien [SMTP:hien_hoang@AFCC.COM]
> Can someone tell me if SAS Code is more efficient than SQL code or
> vice-versa? I have a feeling this efficiency issue depends on the
> scenario but I'm not sure.
Karsten M. Self (email@example.com)
What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?