LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 1997, week 5)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 29 Jul 1997 11:08:15 -0500
Reply-To:     Girish S Patel <girish.s.patel@CCMAIL.CENSUS.GOV>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Girish S Patel <girish.s.patel@CCMAIL.CENSUS.GOV>
Subject:      Re[2]: Missed opportunity?
Comments: To: johnw@MAG-NET.CO.UK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Let's make a proposal to SAS to curb licensing/renewal fees!!!!!!!!

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: Missed opportunity? Author: John Whittington <johnw@MAG-NET.CO.UK> at SMTP-GATEWAY Date: 7/29/97 3:52 PM

On Tue, 29 Jul 1997, Theo DP <theodp@AOL.COM> wrote:

>You're right about paying for Microsoft products once: > >* You paid once for Microsoft Works... >* And once for Microsoft Word 2.0... >* And once for Microsoft Word 6.0... >* And once for Microsoft Office 4.2... >* And once for Microsoft Office 4.2 Professional... >* And once for Microsoft Office '95 Professional... >* And once for Microsoft Office '97 Small Business Edition... >* And once for Microsoft Office '97 Standard Edition... >* And once for Microsoft Office '97 Professional...

Theo - surely the point is that not everyone wants/needs to upgrade that often. With MS products, they only pay again if/when they decide to upgrade; SI force people to pay again (and again, and again ...) even if they decide *not* to upgrade. If SI offered a 'perpetual' licence, small (and poor) users like me would probably still be using 6.10 at the moment - and then maybe wouldn't pay to upgrade until 7.0 (more likely 7.1).

I often wonder at the PR wisdom of SI's licensing policies, since so many people get 'hot under the collar' about this. If they *did* offer perpetual licences, with a charge for technical support after the first year, and *full* (not renewal) prices for each upgrade, then I strongly suspect that their turnover would be just as great (quite probably greater), but most users would be much happier because they felt 'in control' of the choices/decisions!

Regards

John

----------------------------------------------------------- Dr John Whittington, Voice: +44 1296 730225 Mediscience Services Fax: +44 1296 738893 Twyford Manor, Twyford, E-mail: johnw@mag-net.co.uk Buckingham MK18 4EL, UK CompuServe: 100517,3677 -----------------------------------------------------------


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page