|Date: ||Fri, 11 Apr 1997 11:59:02 -0600|
|Reply-To: ||"Raymond V. Liedka" <liedka@UNM.EDU>|
|Sender: ||"SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>|
|From: ||"Raymond V. Liedka" <liedka@UNM.EDU>|
|Subject: ||Re: Leap Year Criteria.|
|Content-Type: ||TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII|
On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Colin Brown 41 61 68 86457(84827) wrote:
> >some countries (of governing bodies) exclude--or are considering
> >excluding--centennial years that are evenly divisible by 1000, but this is
> >not the case in the United States, presently.
> For computing departments in international organisations this could cause much
> fun if some countries decide to make 2000 a leap year and others not- the dates
> after 29.2.2000 will always be out of sync. with each other in the different
> It would probably make a very good 1st April joke...
And for two days, too!!!
Raymond V. Liedka
Department of Sociology
University of New Mexico