| Date: | Thu, 10 Apr 1997 11:07:42 -0500 |
| Reply-To: | dpurcell@spss.com |
| Sender: | "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | Dave Purcell <dpurcell@SPSS.COM> |
| Organization: | SPSS Inc. |
| Subject: | Re: Cronbach's alpha: check item scoring |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Frank M. Howell wrote:
> In survey research, it is often the case that an instrument uses
> "reverse-coding" to reduce "nay-saying" and "yea-saying" bias during
> data collection. These codes tend to get translated into the raw data set
> "as is" during the data-entry process. The analyst, however, can forget
> that these items should all be scored in the same "direction,"
> semantically, before conducting index-construction (RELIABILITY, etc.) in
> SPSS.
Good point, Frank. I used to work as a graduate statistics consultant
at the University of Cincinnati, and this was one of the most common
errors that I found when graduate students would bring their work to me.
Dave
|