LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 1997, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 17 Feb 1997 09:06:00 -0500
Reply-To:     "Ricci, Katherine" <RicciK@AETNA.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Ricci, Katherine" <RicciK@AETNA.COM>
Subject:      Re: SAS and NT
Comments: To: Zita Finton <Zita_Finton@FUSARND.CCMAIL.COMPUSERVE.COM>

The main complaint I've received from institutional users after making the OpenVMS --> NT switch the the inability to assign disk quotas to individual users. This may not be an issue in your case.

The second most common complaint is speed; unless you're running Alpha NT, there will be a noticeable throughput slowdown as compared with Alpha OpenVMS.

I don't know the benchmarks of SAS 6.12 on OpenVMS Alpha vs. NT Alpha or Pentium. You may want to look into these figures.

The migration process can be automated to a degree. The underlying "user account" philosophy is similar between OpenVMS and NT, but the implementations differ. There is no seamless automatic transition between the two systems, although I have been able to extract OpenVMS account information and script "imports" for NT. The biggest difference with accounts is the OpenVMS mail is part of OpenVMS, whereas NT has add-on products, so on NT you must configure accounts then configure mail services. If you use Exchange, there are ways to configure accounts at the same time as a new mail service, but it is not elegant.

Personally, I'd stay with OpenVMS unless there were some significant business reason for moving ($$$, systems consistency). OpenVMS systems are much more reliable (Remember the Win95/NT Reboot Stories), and easier to maintain, and truly are 7x24 systems. Digital has worked feverishly to ensure that the Alpha OpenVMS system will be a robust and reliable server for any Intel/Windows front end.

Just my input.

Kate Ricci

---------- From: Zita Finton To: SAS-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: SAS and NT Date: Friday, February 14, 1997 4:52PM

Hi.

Our systems people are advocating moving from Windows 3.1, VAX Alpha Open VMS cluster and Pathworks to Windows NT. We currently run SAS 6.11 on Pentiums and 6.09 on the VAX and use SAS CONNECT. We are ready to upgrade to 6.12 on both platforms.

I need some input on pros and cons of making the switch to NT and would appreciate any input on problems, efficiency increases, etc.

TIA

Zita Finton Fujisawa, USA


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page