LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (November 1996, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 15 Nov 1996 17:23:29 GMT
Reply-To:     Jay Weedon <j_weedon@ESCAPE.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Jay Weedon <j_weedon@ESCAPE.COM>
Organization: Zippo
Subject:      Re: SAS and FORTRAN

On 14 Nov 1996 16:02:06 GMT, chwu@unlgrad1.unl.edu (McGyver) wrote:

>Recently I need to do some simulation either using FORTRAN or SAS to >generate data. My question is what's the advantage and disadvantage for >SAS and FORTRAN in generating data and which one does better job.

If you need to analyze the data, you're much more likely to get something working quickly with SAS - using either IML or a canned procedure. If you're ONLY generating data, you may still be at a slight advantage with SAS, since there are built-in routines to generate random variates from a number of well known distributions.

Jay Weedon.

"We cannot tolerate the proliferation of this paperwork any longer. It is useless to fight the forms. We must kill the people producing them."

- Attributed to Vladimir Kabaidze, Director of the Ivanovo Machine Works near Moscow, in a speech before the annual Communist Party Congress, 1936.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page