LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 1996, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 3 Sep 1996 10:46:43 EST
Reply-To:     Jerry Dallal <jerry@MINT.HNRC.TUFTS.EDU>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Jerry Dallal <jerry@MINT.HNRC.TUFTS.EDU>
Organization: Tufts University
Subject:      Re: SPSS vs SAS

In article <50fcor$okb@ground.cs.columbia.edu>, reddy@news.cs.columbia.edu (Chandrasekhar Reddy) writes: > Hi: > > Hope I don't start a war.

Nah, we don't have the time.

> Can someone compare SAS and SPSS on the following dimensions: > 1. Data handling abilities

I was about to say, "There are lots of things you can do in SAS that you can't do in SPSS. The question is whether you will ever need to do them." But as I started typing, a different question arose in my mind, namely, can SPSS be viewed as a subset of SAS--that is, is there any data handling task that can be done in SPSS that can't be done in SAS? Again, an affirmative answer does not make SPSS an inferior program. There's still the issue of whether you would need the capabilities that SAS provides over and above those of SPSS.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page