Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:24:23 -0600
Reply-To: Joe Matise <snoopy369@GMAIL.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Joe Matise <snoopy369@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: PROC Report and Format Length
In-Reply-To: <CAM+YpE_WNcnqMQeROJSAMQuU3kR3O9yWctjfPXZhZ3g-akNGvA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Also, if you DO upgrade to 9.3, ODS HTML becomes default (not ODS LISTING)
and therefore you probably wouldn't get this error :)
-Joe
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Joe Matise <snoopy369@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think you only get those comments if you have the LISTING destination
> turned on. Turn it off before running your PROC REPORT (via
> ODS LISTING close;
> )
> and you should be good to go.
>
> -Joe
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Mary Rosenbloom <
> mary.rosenbloom.sas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A colleague has the following question:
>>
>> "For many moons now I have received nasty messages from proc report if a
>> variable format is > $99. So I use width = 99 in proc report and get on
>> with life. All I really care about is the rtf report anyway, but I have a
>> strong aversion to ERROR messages in my log.
>>
>> "All of a sudden the 99 cutoff has changed to 71. I have not deliberately
>> changed anything that should cause such a change. In particular, I have
>> not upgraded SAS, or deliberately done any downloads of any sort from the
>> SAS site."
>>
>>
>> Anyone care to comment? Thanks in advance! By the way, we recently
>> upgraded to SAS 9.3, so that may be why the log messages are a little
>> different from before.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mary R.
>>
>
>
| 
