Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:16:10 -0600
Reply-To: Bhupinder Singh Farmaha <bhupi80singh@YAHOO.CO.IN>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Bhupinder Singh Farmaha <bhupi80singh@YAHOO.CO.IN>
Subject: Re: SAS-L statistics compilation/names tracking
In-Reply-To: <36C1DBAB4B1949D6AB36BD27E64168BB@D1871RB1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Nat,
I believe so. Our team is playing in Australia now and they are doing
disaster.
Bhupinder
-----Original Message-----
From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Nat
Wooding
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 9:50 PM
To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: SAS-L statistics compilation/names tracking
Bhupinder
Way too many cricket references here for the Americans in the audience.
Nat
-----Original Message-----
From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of
Bhupinder Singh Farmaha
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 10:15 PM
To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: SAS-L statistics compilation/names tracking
Art,
It motivates me more to quickly complete my century!!!
Bhupinder
-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Tabachneck [mailto:art297@ROGERS.COM]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 7:35 PM
To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU; Bhupinder Farmaha
Subject: Re: SAS-L statistics compilation/names tracking
Bhupinder,
Actually, as of December 31, 2011, you had a total of 83 posts in addition
to any you might have had using email addresses that we don't have mapped.
Art
---------
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:04:30 -0600, Bhupinder Singh Farmaha
<bhupi80singh@YAHOO.CO.IN> wrote:
>Interesting. I didn't know when I scored the half century !!!
>
>Bhupinder
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of
>Joe Matise
>Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 4:39 PM
>To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
>Subject: SAS-L statistics compilation/names tracking
>
>Hi folks,
>
>As you may or may not know, each year we compile a set of stats
>regarding the previous year's posts, the results of which are presented
>at the combined SAS-L/sasCommunity.org/SAS Discussion Forum Meetup at
>the SAS Global Forum (this year in Orlando - wish I could be there
>instead of in undoubtedly snowy Chicago!).
>
>The accuracy of the analyses is dependent upon all of us ensuring that
>our various email addresses are correctly linked, regardless of whether
>they include your name or not. If you prefer to have your name not
>used, it is still useful to have your various email addresses linked by
>a common pseudonym (like data _null_).
>
>While this used to be one of Howard Schreier's projects, this year I
>have voluntarily inherited the responsibility for maintaining the database.
>We hope that the new format is relatively secure. It is presented as a
>read-only spreadsheet that contains the same information that Howard
>used
to
>show on his page. We use the database to consolidate each year's posts
>so that we can get fairly accurate counts for all posters.
>
>1. Access the database by clicking on either:
>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?
key=0AlZr8pw0HlvIdEx2Mzg0T1R2eWRfVEZ
>nSTRfUU1oTUE
>or,
>if that wraps in this post, a tiny link to that same site is:
>http://tiny.cc/wxn1t
>
>2. Simultaneously pressing CTRL-F will allow you to quickly find a name
>or email.
>
>3. Let me know, offline, about any corrections or additions that are
needed.
>If possible, send that information by this upcoming Monday (1/16/2012)
>so
it
>can be included in the analysis Art is preparing for SGF this year.
>
>4. FYI, the column labeled 'level' indicates the number of posts that
>have been submitted from each email address:
>
> *** = 50 or more posts
> ** = 25 - 49 posts
> * = 10-24 posts
>
>However, we only included emails for those individuals for which the
>database already had a name assigned to the email address, or for which
>the email address had 50 or more posts.
>
>Thanks to Art for doing most of the work on this (including drafting
>most
of
>this email, though any mistakes are my own) and to Howard for keeping
>up with this for so many years.
>
>Thanks!
>-Joe
|