LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2011, week 2)Back to main CONCH-L pageJoin or leave CONCH-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 10 Jul 2011 06:51:30 -0400
Reply-To:     Conchologists List <CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
Sender:       Conchologists List <CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Marlo Krisberg <marlo@CFL.RR.COM>
Subject:      Re: Lithopoma tectum (Lightfoot,
              1786) and L. tectum americanum (Gmelin, 1791)
In-Reply-To:  <4E18D09B.50303@mindspring.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

Thanks, Harry. I doubt more than one or two people will off specimens. In the end, I think we really won't know until some graduate student takes an interest and does the DNA work.

Marlo

From: Conchologists List [mailto:CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Harry G. Lee Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 6:05 PM To: CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: [CONCH-L] Lithopoma tectum (Lightfoot, 1786) and L. tectum americanum (Gmelin, 1791)

That's a lot of work, Marlo. Thanks!

I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss ecological factors affecting shell morphology at this point. A strategized campaign to compare grass flat populations with ones from offshore (associated with extensive coral reef habitats) might produce interesting results. Lots of specimens may be needed to empower the morphometrics (for which you have laid the groundwork) for statistical testing.

Harry

On 7/9/2011 5:26 PM, Marlo Krisberg wrote:

Some time ago I posted presentations of subject shells and took the position they were two distinct species based upon comparison of opercula. Thanks to the keen insight of several readers it was determined that the operculum I had associated with the L. tectum specimen was erroneous. Since then I have accomplished a bit more research and have concluded that the subject species are most probably morphs of one species; namely, Lithopoma tectum (Lightfoot, 1786), adopting the senior name. My review, data and rationale are presented at:

http://z14.invisionfree.com/Conchologist_Forum/index.php?showtopic=2166

I'd like to expand my photo coverage to include more specimens of both forms (hopefully collected from the same locale at the same time), but mostly specimens of the form L. tectum americanum from the Bahamas, West Indies and South America. I'd consider purchases, but would prefer loans for a photo session, since I try not to accumulate shells. If you're coming to COA and would be willing to bring some, let me know and I'll be there for them.

Comments and photo inputs welcome.

Marlo@cfl.rr.com

-- Harry G. Lee MD 4132 Ortega Forest Drive Jacksonville, FL USA (904) 389 4049 shells@hglee.com hglee2@mindspring.com


[text/html]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main CONCH-L page