LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2011, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:18:46 -0500
Reply-To:     Arthur Tabachneck <art297@ROGERS.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Arthur Tabachneck <art297@ROGERS.COM>
Subject:      Why we have SAS-L

Seeing an automatic OOO response from someone from SAS, this morning, reminded me of a thread that I've been meaning to start for some time.

First, while I haven't seen it mentioned on the list since I started posting here in 1999, there really is a reason why SAS staff can't use SAS-L as a mechanism for providing technical support. The topic was discussed way back in early 1987 that, for legal reasons, a commercial entity can't use bitnet as a vehicle for offering technical support (see, e.g.: http://vm.marist.edu/htbin/wlvtype?SAS-L.124 ).

For those of you not familiar with bitnet (i.e., the because-its-time- network), you can read a bit about it at: http://ecommerce.hostip.info/pages/107/Bitnet.html and http://computing.dcu.ie/~humphrys/net.80s.html

And, since the listserv on which SAS-L exists is still based in academia, the same legal restrictions probably apply yet today. However, there was nothing wrong with SAS staff ("birdies") reading the posts and replying to some of us with answers we could then post to the list. The issue may have been less restrictive when the listserv and usenet started mirroring each other, but that also introduced a lot of unwanted noise as can be seen if one looks at comp.soft-sys.sas today. I, for one, like the fact that we get so little of that noise today.

Similarly, the question of how to advertise the benefits of SAS-L was also discussed shortly after SAS-L started (see, e.g.: http://vm.marist.edu/htbin/wlvtype?SAS-L.97 ). That, clearly, is still something that I don't think has ever been sufficiently addressed.

The topic of what to advertise, though, requires that we know who we are, why we are here, what we are trying to accomplish, and where we stand relative to complementary and/or competitive sites like sasCommunity.org, the SAS Forums, usenet and runsubmit.

In short, I am hoping that this thread can prompt a discussion that will help to provide answers to some if not all of those questions/issues.

Art


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page