LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (January 2011, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Sun, 9 Jan 2011 09:24:29 +1300
Reply-To:   Tom Robinson <barefootguru@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Tom Robinson <barefootguru@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:   Re: Frustration With SAS - My Vote for most poorly implemented Programming Language "Feature"
In-Reply-To:   <B90B817A9BBB904AAAD7EC321C015967073766@USFCH-MAIL1.lewin.com>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Jack's yanking our chain :-) Either deliberately or not...

Looks like his 'test' libname is assigned to the SPD engine:

<http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/engspde/61887/HTML/default/viewer.htm#a002612026.htm>

It certainly doesn't work using 'work' under 9.2

And keeping with the thread: how about SAS offering to close a View Table window when I try to overwrite the data set by running more code, instead of just complaining it's already in use?

Cheers

On 2011-01-09, at 06:47, Kirby, Ted wrote:

> Is that a SAS 9.2 enhancement? When I try that code on 9.1.3, I get the > usual error SAS stopped processing because the dataset was not sorted by > the BY variable. > > (I tried to navigate through the 9.2 "What's New" online documentation > to see if it was a new feature, but, as pointed out in other posts in > this thread, found the 9.2 documentation a pain to navigate and could > not find anything.) > > Ted Kirby, > Consultant, > The Lewin Group, Inc. > 3130 Fairview Park, Suite 800 > Falls Church, VA 22042 > Phone: (703)269-5507 > Fax: (703)269-5501 > e-mail: ted.kirby@lewin.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of > Jack Hamilton > Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 1:27 AM > To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: Frustration With SAS - My Vote for most poorly implemented > Programming Language "Feature" > > On Jan 6, 2011, at 1:06 PM, Morley Herbert wrote: > >> I find it very annoying when many PROC's will not run because the data > is not sorted. The log message even tells you the problem and which by > variables need to be sorted. Why can it not sort the data set and then > run the PROC? >> >> Morley Herbert > > > You mean like this? > > ===== > 29 proc sort data=sashelp.class out=test.class; > 30 by sex; > 31 run; > > NOTE: There were 19 observations read from the data set SASHELP.CLASS. > NOTE: SAS sort was used. > NOTE: The data set TEST.CLASS has 19 observations and 5 variables. > NOTE: PROCEDURE SORT used (Total process time): > real time 0.04 seconds > cpu time 0.01 seconds > > > 32 > 33 proc print data=test.class; > 34 by age; > 35 run; > > NOTE: BY ordering was produced by performing an automatic sort on table > TEST.class > NOTE: There were 19 observations read from the data set TEST.CLASS. > NOTE: PROCEDURE PRINT used (Total process time): > real time 0.06 seconds > cpu time 0.04 seconds


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page