Date:         Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:45:32 -0800
Reply-To:     jfh@stanfordalumni.org
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Jack Hamilton <jfh@STANFORDALUMNI.ORG>
Subject:      Re: Frustration With SAS - My Vote for most poorly implemented
              Programming Language "Feature"
Comments: To: Michael Raithel <michaelraithel@WESTAT.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <037AB3FF38D44C4BAFB5DFF3D06B57BAA6FDF51E@EX-CMS01.westat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:55 -0500, "Michael Raithel"
<michaelraithel@WESTAT.COM> wrote:

> ...and today I got this very nice note from one (of the many) brainiacs
> in Cary:
>
> "I'll be glad to share your suggestion with our development team. Thanks
> for the great idea."
>
> Since they think that it was _MY_ idea, I am going to take full credit
> for it if they implement it and be totally insufferable at SAS Global
> Forum, PharmaSUG, TASS, WUSS, etc.:-)

So, no change from the usual?



--
Brevis esse laboro, obscurus fio.

Jack Hamilton
Sacramento, California
jfh@alumni.stanford.org