it seems that once I used the missing option in one proc means, it affected
sub-sequential proc means without this option.
how to shut it off?
From: Jack F. Hamilton [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: December-11-10 9:02 PM
To: Howard Schreier
Cc: Jack Hamilton; bbser2009
Subject: Re: proc means, the level of missing values
Interesting article. I'm not sure I agree with the distinction between
implicit and explicit CLASS statements, which I don't see as important
enough to deserve to be mentioned in the first paragraph, but then I didn't
go to the trouble to write the article.
On Dec 11, 2010, at 16:16 , Howard Schreier wrote:
> Note that the MISSING option for PROC FREQ is somewhat different in nature
(vis a vis MEANS and others), because the filtering it governs is different.