I already feared something like that Martyn, Just for the record, you postings appear unreadable on SAS-L, e.g. http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1009e&L=sas-l&D=1&O=D&P=5791 possibly because of some charset that you send them in. Regards - Jim. -- Jim Groeneveld, Netherlands Statistician/SAS consultant http://jim.groeneveld.eu.tf My computer, my wife and I will attend PhUSE 2010 in Berlin. ________________________________ From: "Martyn.Jones@Euroclear.com" <Martyn.Jones@Euroclear.com> To: Jim Groeneveld <jim.1stat@YAHOO.COM> Cc: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Sent: Thu, 30 September, 2010 11:26:05 Subject: Re: Datetime displays incorrectly Thanks for the research, Jim. Looking at a small sample of my data, it also occurs for .072, .160, .672, and .224.... Martyn "Jim Groeneveld" <jim.1stat@YAHOO.COM> Sent by: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> 30/09/2010 10:45 AM Please respond to "Jim Groeneveld" <jim.1stat@YAHOO.COM> To SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU cc Subject Re: Datetime displays incorrectly Hi Art, I can add to that that the problematic formatting only occurs in SAS 9.1.3 with the decimal seconds of .672, not with .670, .671, .673 or .674. I haven't been looking further. Regards - Jim. -- Jim Groeneveld, Netherlands Statistician/SAS consultant http://jim.groeneveld.eu.tf My computer, my wife and I will attend PhUSE 2010 in Berlin. This e-mail message, including any attachments transmitted with it, is CONFIDENTIAL and may contain legally privileged information. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately and delete it from your system. Please visit our website to read the full disclaimer: http://www.euroclear.com/site/public/disclaimer