Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:28:04 +0000
Reply-To: toby dunn <tobydunn@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: toby dunn <tobydunn@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: OT: Which Came First the DATA Step or the PROC?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I for one would eat the chicken as most cook can't cook a proper omelet to save their lives.
"Don't bail. The best gold is at the bottom of barrels of crap."
"Be prepared. Luck is where preparation meets opportunity."
> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 06:30:31 -0400
> From: michaelraithel@WESTAT.COM
> Subject: OT: Which Came First the DATA Step or the PROC?
> To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Dear SAS-L-ers,
> Well, we may never know the answer to the age-old SAS question: "Which came first, the DATA Step or the PROC?", but it seems that scientists have finally answered that other long-standing question:
> After reading that article, I can't decide whether to have a chicken sandwich or an omelet for lunch:-)
> Best of luck in all your SAS endeavors!
> I hope that this suggestion proves helpful now, and in the future!
> Of course, all of these opinions and insights are my own, and do not reflect those of my organization or my associates. All SAS code and/or methodologies specified in this posting are for illustrative purposes only and no warranty is stated or implied as to their accuracy or applicability. People deciding to use information in this posting do so at their own risk.
> Michael A. Raithel
> "The man who wrote the book on performance"
> E-mail: MichaelRaithel@westat.com
> Author: Tuning SAS Applications in the MVS Environment
> Author: Tuning SAS Applications in the OS/390 and z/OS Environments, Second Edition
> Author: The Complete Guide to SAS Indexes
> Weekends don't count unless you spend them doing something completely pointless. - Bill Watterson
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.