LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2010, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:38:36 -0400
Reply-To:     oloolo <dynamicpanel@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         oloolo <dynamicpanel@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Can SAS-L be improved?
Comments: To: Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>

no matter how sophisticated a search engine is, the intelligence of human brain is not replaceble, hence I think SAS-L still stands on top of all forums/knowlege Xchange portals, especially SAS-L has a loyal high quality professionals who are actively responing to Q's here. This Q/A forum is sometimes better than a knowlege Xchange portal in the sense that for inexperienced users, they may not know exactly what to search for and an experienced user can guide them through via posting back and forth. This is more of a Class Room style v.s. self study style. For talented and experienced student, self study may be superior but for average Joe, a professor is of great help.

The drop in hits may be due to the fact that new SAS users post on other forums so that the visibility of SAS-L is decreased among all clouds rising in recent years. I also check out SAS groups on but not mostly remain silent there. Examine the activity freqency and recency of top posters on SAS-L will be an interesting sub-task and I've made a note of this on my list.

On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:34:47 -0400, Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET> wrote:

>Jay, > >It's a nice concept, but so are all of the others. > >What I was thinking about was actually something similar to a cross >between Les Jansen's site, those search engines that submit a search to >multiple search engines and show the results in separate windows, and a >single point of entry that would allow one to simultaneously post to one >or more of those sites as well as enroll and specify the degree of >interaction they want with each. > >Art >--------- >On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:34:21 -0400, Jay Stevens <jay.l.stevens@GMAIL.COM> >wrote: > >>I've raised this same question a few times here over the last 2 years. >Most >>recently 9 months ago, I posted this: >> >> is a knowledge exchange site that is focused exclusively >>on SAS. It uses a reputation system and collaborative voting to ensure >that >>the best and most helpful answers to questions are bubbled up to the top. >> >> Historically, the primary user-driven community for information about >>programming and using SAS was SAS-L, the usenet newsgroup comp.soft- > >>This creates a problem for the user in search of knowledge about SAS. >While >>much of the content on SAS-L is useful and usable, its not always >accessible >>and the user is left to filter the signal from the noise themselves. >> avoids this issue. Interesting and Useful questions are >voted >>up by the community. Interesting and useful answers are likewise voted >up, >>ensuring that the wisdom of the crowd is leveraged for all users. >Overall, >>it has the potential to be a significantly better model than SAS-L. >UseNet >>newsgroups served their purpose, but really amounts to not much more than >>searching through a stack of email conversations which users (who are just >>looking for answers) are forced. >> >> In addition, each question on can have multiple tags >which >>allows for a rich categorization of the content to better enable relevant >>searching. >> >> is built on top of the same technology that drives >> (the programming Q&A site that has quickly become >one >>of the top 500 sites on the web) and uses a similar system of reputation >and >>xbox-style badges to encourage community participation in something of an >>addictive way. In addition, as users reach higher levels of reputation, >>they are granted more capabilities in the system. Ultimately, once the >>system trusts you through your reputation, both questions and answers >become >>editable in a wiki-like way. This allows those users who have earned the >>trust of their peers to continually improve the questions and answers over >>time. >> >>Andrew's list of alternate sources of SAS information highlights the >>problem. There are hundreds of forums/outlets for potentially good SAS >>information on the web, but without some kind of collaborative filtering >to >>encourage the best, most-useful, most-helpful content to rise to the top, >>none of these are any better than doing a search through that stack of >>emails. >> >>The content and knowledge found in SAS-L over the decades is amazing. >>Unfortunately, I think that time will shows that SAS-L (as a useful and >>usable channel to access that information) has been dying a slow death for >>years with the advent of the social media uprising. >> >>Go check it out and see if there might be a slightly better way to do >this. >>

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page