Date:         Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:09:15 -0400
Reply-To:     Nat Wooding <nathani@VERIZON.NET>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Nat Wooding <nathani@VERIZON.NET>
Subject:      Re: Can SAS-L be improved?
In-Reply-To:  <4C3CE69D.7060801@anjgroup.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

One major difference between SAS-L and Institute-sponsored sites is that
Institute employees cannot post on SAS-L although they do monitor the
traffic and interact through go-betweens when they feel it to be necessary.
The thread this morning concerning using ODS with a Sudaan module called by
SAS appears to be a good example of a situation where Institute would help.

Allowing Institute employees to participate would seem to be an improvement.


My $.000002

Nat Wooding