LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2010, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:32:29 -0700
Reply-To:     Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Subject:      Re: Need to find a value that can make the equation's value = 0
              like Solver in Excel
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

If you only need to solve for one value, couldn't you just a binary- tree-type-search using a do while loop?

Art ---------- On Jul 11, 1:34 pm, CC <chchanghe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 10, 8:04 pm, Patrick <patrick.mat...@gmx.ch> wrote: > > > "...need to find Ri for each firm/year." > > If it's firm/year why then isn't it Ri,t? > > It would be helpful for someone like me if you also could explain what > > the different literals mean (M, B, ROE,...). I assume ROE is Return on > > Investment, but what's the rest? > > Was this formula given to you or did you develop it based on a > > problem? My unqualified impression is that this is more a question of > > getting the maths right first. > > Hi Patrick, > > The formula is a simplified version but I am sure this will not affect > the result as my main problem is to find a function to deal with it (I > am pretty sure even it is a simplified version, we can still get an > answer if we know which function we can use.). And, of course, I will > use the complete version of formula to solve this question later. The > M and B are the market value and book value, respectively. I did not > want to mention it since I will not like to confuse people and want to > simply focus on the question itself. And, yes, it should be Ri,t > instead of Ri. So, your observation is correct. Thanks for that. > But, if we can find one Ri then the rest is easy > relatively. Could you give me some suggestions on how to solve it? > Thanks.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page