| Date: | Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:36:02 -0400 |
| Reply-To: | Jay Stevens <jay.l.stevens@GMAIL.COM> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | Jay Stevens <jay.l.stevens@GMAIL.COM> |
| Subject: | Fwd: Can SAS-L be improved? |
| In-Reply-To: | <AANLkTiluscztlMugbQTZYOddPZwGUgU1XJBYPE4pFf1g@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
|---|
Art,
That seems significantly more complicated and doesn't actually resolve what
I view as the main problem. Right now every voice (whether its a spam
message or from a knowledgeable sas expert) on SAS-L has equal weight.
Further, as you know, in SAS, there are always at least 5 different ways to
solve the same problem. That dynamic isn't biased towards finding the best,
most-useful answers to specific SAS programming questions. Likewise, a
multiple-search-engine interface approach would only exacerbate that
problem. We need a way to filter the signal from the noise, not just find
more noise to sort through.
I don't think that the approach we're taking with www.runsubmit.com is the
*only* good approach, but it is certainly, by now, a proven approach to the
problem as witnessed by the phenomenal success of StackOverflow which took
on a similar problem for the much broader topic of *ALL* programming related
questions. Their defeat of a similarly poor knowledge exchange model
(Experts Exchange) is in process as seen here...
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=stackoverflow.com,+experts-exchange.com
I'm convinced that with enough critical mass of active contributors, this
concept (on www.runsubmit.com) could prove to be a MUCH better one than the
others.
J
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Arthur Tabachneck <art297@netscape.net>wrote:
> Jay,
>
> It's a nice concept, but so are all of the others.
>
> What I was thinking about was actually something similar to a cross
> between Les Jansen's site, those search engines that submit a search to
> multiple search engines and show the results in separate windows, and a
> single point of entry that would allow one to simultaneously post to one
> or more of those sites as well as enroll and specify the degree of
> interaction they want with each.
>
> Art
> ---------
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:34:21 -0400, Jay Stevens <jay.l.stevens@GMAIL.COM>
> wrote:
>
> >I've raised this same question a few times here over the last 2 years.
> Most
> >recently 9 months ago, I posted this:
> >
> > RunSubmit.com is a knowledge exchange site that is focused exclusively
> >on SAS. It uses a reputation system and collaborative voting to ensure
> that
> >the best and most helpful answers to questions are bubbled up to the top.
> >
> > Historically, the primary user-driven community for information about
> >programming and using SAS was SAS-L, the usenet newsgroup comp.soft-
> sys.sas.
> >This creates a problem for the user in search of knowledge about SAS.
> While
> >much of the content on SAS-L is useful and usable, its not always
> accessible
> >and the user is left to filter the signal from the noise themselves.
> >RunSubmit.com avoids this issue. Interesting and Useful questions are
> voted
> >up by the community. Interesting and useful answers are likewise voted
> up,
> >ensuring that the wisdom of the crowd is leveraged for all users.
> Overall,
> >it has the potential to be a significantly better model than SAS-L.
> UseNet
> >newsgroups served their purpose, but really amounts to not much more than
> >searching through a stack of email conversations which users (who are just
> >looking for answers) are forced.
> >
> > In addition, each question on runsubmit.com can have multiple tags
> which
> >allows for a rich categorization of the content to better enable relevant
> >searching.
> >
> > RunSubmit.com is built on top of the same technology that drives
> >www.stackoverflow.com (the programming Q&A site that has quickly become
> one
> >of the top 500 sites on the web) and uses a similar system of reputation
> and
> >xbox-style badges to encourage community participation in something of an
> >addictive way. In addition, as users reach higher levels of reputation,
> >they are granted more capabilities in the system. Ultimately, once the
> >system trusts you through your reputation, both questions and answers
> become
> >editable in a wiki-like way. This allows those users who have earned the
> >trust of their peers to continually improve the questions and answers over
> >time.
> >
> >Andrew's list of alternate sources of SAS information highlights the
> >problem. There are hundreds of forums/outlets for potentially good SAS
> >information on the web, but without some kind of collaborative filtering
> to
> >encourage the best, most-useful, most-helpful content to rise to the top,
> >none of these are any better than doing a search through that stack of
> >emails.
> >
> >The content and knowledge found in SAS-L over the decades is amazing.
> >Unfortunately, I think that time will shows that SAS-L (as a useful and
> >usable channel to access that information) has been dying a slow death for
> >years with the advent of the social media uprising.
> >
> >Go check it out and see if there might be a slightly better way to do
> this.
> >www.runsubmit.com
>
|