|Date: ||Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:43:05 -0400|
|Reply-To: ||oloolo <dynamicpanel@YAHOO.COM>|
|Sender: ||"SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>|
|From: ||oloolo <dynamicpanel@YAHOO.COM>|
|Subject: ||Re: 2010 SASware Ballot Results.|
I also agree with DATA _NULL_ in the sense that many to-be-voted-features
can be realized using existing functionality without much difficulties, it
makes many SASware Ballot items suffer from highly skewed selection bias
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:50:42 -0500, Kevin Myers <KevinMyers@AUSTIN.RR.COM>
>That's one of the biggest problems that I have with the SASWare Ballot.
>can't really figure out what many of these enhancements are about unless
>are personally already very familiar with those specific issues, and even
>then it is sometimes difficult. The online ballot needs to provide links
>for each ballot item to more detailed information that can be reviewed
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Data _null_;" <iebupdte@GMAIL.COM>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:42
>Subject: Re: 2010 SASware Ballot Results.
>> Overall Rank=4 Rank Within Part=3 Votes=396
>> provide the ability to retrieve all metadata regarding a SAS data set
>> from one location
>> I don't understand this one. Can anyone explain this?
>> Overall Rank=5 Rank Within Part=2 Votes=376
>> enhance the YMDDTTMw. datetime informat to enable it to read an
>> AM or PM, if present, in the time portion of the value, and provide a
>> datetime YMDDTTMw. format
>> This one would be nice. Of course you can make the FORMAT with PICTURE
>> more built in formats are always nice.
>> data _null_;
>> x = input('2010-04-14 2:21 pm',anydtdtm20.);
>> y = input('2010-04-14 2:21 pm',ymddttm20.);
>> *z = input('2010-04-14 2:21 pm',ymdampm20.);
>> put (_all_)(=datetime.);