Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:02:50 -0400
Reply-To: Joe Whitehurst <joewhitehurst@GMAIL.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Joe Whitehurst <joewhitehurst@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: Joe Whitehurst (was Fw: Rant on a pharma job interview:)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
So, you admit you are half wit, in other words, a nit wit :-)),
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:37 PM, oloolo <email@example.com> wrote:
> or adding a rule in the email box, filtering out both or either of the
> this post is very long, so I cut it half
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 08:47:25 -0700, Jack Hamilton <jfh@STANFORDALUMNI.ORG>
> >There have been political and personal posts on SAS-L at least since the
> internet era, and possibly before that. They are unlikely to stop. Just
> as they are unlikely to stop anywhere else.
> >It might, however, be possible to train other SAS-L-ers not to make the
> problem worse by responding to them or publicly complaining about them,
> which adds heat but no light to the discussion. But I doubt it.
> >So you'll just have to live with it.
> >If the two or three emails between Joe and Kevin take up enough space in
> your inbox that you need to worry about it, you need a new hard drive or a
> new email provider or both.
> >Jack Hamilton
> >Caelum non animum mutant qui trans mare currunt.
> >On Apr 7, 2010, at 7:25 , Mike O'Brien wrote:
> >> Hey folks,
> >> Usually I remain impartial on these matters, but these antics are a
> waste of
> >> my time and, I am sure, everyone else's on this list. In the future,
> >> any bickering or personal squabbling to your personal emails and don't
> >> valuable space in my inbox. I feel this is a list for SAS RELATED
> >> ONLY and NOT POLITICAL COMMENTARY or PERSONAL ARGUMENTS!
> >> Does anyone else out there agree?
> >> Just my 2 cents.
> >> Regards, Mike