LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2010, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:26:46 -0800
Reply-To:     "J.k" <cakheil@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "J.k" <cakheil@GMAIL.COM>
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Subject:      PHREG w/ strata question
Comments: To: sas-l@uga.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I've run into a question regarding how PHREG functions when using the strata statement to generate risk sets for a conditional logistic regression modeling match case control data (1:N). Each strata group originally had at least one case and one control. However after applying an exclusion criteria some of the risk sets lost their only case or only control. These groups with no event or censored values seem to be still included by PHREG. Should PHREG have removed them automatically? Do I need to remove them prior to calling the procedure or should they be left in the model? It seems to me that all 35 of the groups should be excluded but I'm more of a programmer than a statistician. Any comments would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Model Information

Data Set WORK.X_MASTERFILE Dependent Variable status Censoring Variable CC_STATUS Case/control status Censoring Value(s) 0 Ties Handling BRESLOW

Number of Observations Read 7510 Number of Observations Used 7510

Summary of the Number of Event and Censored Values

Percent Pattern Total Event Censored Censored Freq

1 1 0 1 100.00 4 2 1 1 0 0.00 1 3 2 0 2 100.00 30 4 2 1 1 50.00 520 5 3 1 2 66.67 2135


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page