| Date: | Sun, 28 Feb 2010 06:12:19 -0800 |
|---|
| Reply-To: | Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET> |
|---|
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
|---|
| From: | Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET> |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: source vs. nosource system option |
|---|
|
| In-Reply-To: | <e1fdd0e6-5bac-45e5-a866-84bb57b2bd04@g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> |
|---|
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
|---|
Rune,
I couldn't find which is the default in the documentation either, but
the current settings definitely appear as a result of running "proc
options;run;" (on my system at least). And, since I've never changed
them, source and nosource2 appear to be the likely default settings.
Art
--------------
On Feb 28, 6:22 am, Anaconda <r...@fastlane.no> wrote:
> The SOURCE system option decides whether the source code is written to
> the log. In the SAS documentation it I cannot find which one of SOURCE
> or NOSOURCE that are default. Which one is it?
> By writing
> proc options ;
> run;
> I can not find out which one is activated either.
> I also write
> %let _scr = %sysfunc(getoption(source));
> %put &_scr;
> but then I get
> WARNING: Apparent symbolic reference _SCR not resolved.
>
> - Anaconda
|
