LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2010)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:10:11 -0800
Reply-To:     Bruce Weaver <bruce.weaver@hotmail.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Bruce Weaver <bruce.weaver@hotmail.com>
Subject:      Re: t-test with small n
In-Reply-To:  <4E70ADC2-5C5A-4C1D-B18F-7D033478ABF2@ifi.uzh.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

aschoff wrote: > > Hello, > > we are dealing with survey data for two independent groups we would > like to compare. Due to missing values we have very small and unevenly > distributed data for some parts of the survey (e.g. 5 responses for > one group, 8 responses for the control group, answers on likert > scales). We have a discussion whether a t-test can be used to compare > these two groups. > > We assume that is is not appropriate to use the t-test but we would > like to understand the exact nature of the problem. We are aware of > the requirments for the t-test like normal distribution, equal > variances etc. We are also aware that this test has a low test-power, > however when we try it out the test turns out to be significant. > > What would be the correct argument to refuse using the t-test for this > situation (if it is to be refused?). Is it just because we are having > difficulties to prove that we meet the requirements? What would you > consider a lower boundary that justifies to use a t-test? Would it be > more appropriate to use a non parametric test or is it just impossible > to show a systematic difference with a small N like this? > > Thanks a lot for your input. > Robinson > >

You might find this BMJ note useful.

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/apr06_1/a3166

----- -- Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM."

NOTE: My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/t-test-with-small-n-tp27323363p27324124.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page