| Date: | Mon, 9 Nov 2009 02:56:08 -0800 |
| Reply-To: | "Eli Y. Kling" <eli.kling@GMAIL.COM> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | "Eli Y. Kling" <eli.kling@GMAIL.COM> |
| Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
| Subject: | Re: Rolling window autocorrelation |
|
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
|---|
Sam,
The rolling calculations are powerful when the underpinning patterns
shift over time. In these cases the good old time series models go
stale very fast. One strategy is to refit them every so often (once a
week or once a day) which is kind of a rolling solution. I find that
calculating the explanatory variables, their correlations, and
autocorrelations on a rolling basis results in more power and
interoperability. The last client I worked for had The Enterprise
Miner, ETS and more. We through the works at the data and got very
poor performance on the test data. By the time we applied the models
the rules of the games had changed. It was a classic case of over
fitting the training with lousy predictive value. The break through
was when we just used Base, Stat & Graph to create a system that was
based on rolling calculations fed into good old-fashioned statistical
modelling tools (well I did have a good time using proc NLMIXED as it
was not as straight forward as I pretend). Since the Licence is much
cheaper if you concentrate on sas Analytics Pro, I do not have proc
Expand. The data step and the procedures in sas/stat do very nicely
for me thank you very much. But the bottom line is that one must fit
the tool for the job.
With regard,
Eli
|