LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2009, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:02:39 -0400
Reply-To:     Wensui Liu <liuwensui@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Wensui Liu <liuwensui@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: rate in PersonYear ==> Linear Model or Poisson Model?
Comments: To: Helen <helen.guiyun.li@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <e4188344-2f7c-4892-a08a-eda3b332c0e2@m3g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Helen, If I were you, I will model sick_day as poisson response with person year as offset term. for the amt $, my hunch is gamma. but i am 100% sure.

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Helen <helen.guiyun.li@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all, > > Many thanks in advance for any suggestions you can provided in the > following 3 questions. > > > 1. Should I treat the following outcomes as continuous variables > using > linear regression modelling, or treat it as count variables using > Poisson model, please? > > > outcome1 = sick-days/PersonYear > outcome2 = Amount-of-dollars/PersonYear > > > 2. How to handle the sample size calculation for a Poisson > distributed > outcome, please? such as: the CONTROL group rate is 10 events/ > personyear, if I think TREATMENT group with 8 events/personyear > [(10-8)/10=20% decrease] will be good enough to concluded that the > TREATMENT is significant better than CONTROL, how many 'personyear' > in > each group at 0.05 confidential level with 80% power should I have, > please? any suggestion (software, paper) is very appreciated! > > > 3. To compare whether or not the rate_2005 (10/PersonYear) vs. > rate_2006 (20/PersonYear) vs. rate_2007 (40/PersonYear) in whoe BC > province, which options do you perfer, please? > > > (1) No P value avaialble because no "sampling", the rate_2005, 2006, > 2007 were calculated based on the all events and all people in whole > province. We can simply concluded: > - compared to 2006, rate_2007 increased 50% [(40%-20%)/40% = 50%] > -compared to 2005, the rate-2007 increased 75% [(40%-10%)/40% = 75%]. > > > (2) use Poisson model to get a P value. GEE in the Poisson model to > handle clustering within subject (one person may have injury in 2005, > and then in 2006, and then in 2007-multipel innury) . > > > Sincerely > Helen >

-- ============================== WenSui Liu Blog : statcompute.spaces.live.com Tough Times Never Last. But Tough People Do. - Robert Schuller ==============================


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page