LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2009, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:00:27 -0700
Reply-To:     Steve Denham <stevedrd@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Steve Denham <stevedrd@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Draize scoring
Comments: To: joey m <sasuser.joey.m@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <705bcd670909161058r514d950ak3615d55d6b997bd3@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

You might consider an exact Mantel-Haenszel test (see the PROC FREQ documentation), if you had just one or two timepoints. If you are really interested in the time by treatment interaction (or the sponsor is {or should be}), then I'm out of ideas, since the multinomial distributions in GENMOD generally don't do well with repeated measures. I'd go for a graphical exploration first to see if there is a critical date when separation occurs, and then back to the exact MH.

Let us know what you decide. It is important. Steve Denham Associate Director, Biostatistics MPI Research, Inc.

----- Original Message ---- From: joey m <sasuser.joey.m@GMAIL.COM> To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 1:58:39 PM Subject: Re: Draize scoring

Hi Paul:

Thanks a lot. Sorry for my delay to replay. It was caused by a virus...not in my computer...in my body. I know this questions is more statistical that SAS, but I have been reading some papers to get some light, but no luck so far. Now, healthy again, I will restart my reading.

Not only the number of categories is small, also,the number of subjects. They will be (it is a research in preparation) 25-30 subjects. They will be assigned to 4 or 5 treatments (more or less 3 animals per group, for each sex), and scoring will be done daily, during a period of 14 days.

Thanks, I appreciate your help.

J.

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Swank, Paul R <Paul.R.Swank@uth.tmc.edu>wrote:

> Given the small number of categories, I don't think Wilcoxon would be best > because of the number of ties. How many subjects do you have. A generalized > linear model (multinomial) or logistic (event/trials) may be a better way to > go. > > Dr. Paul R. Swank, > Professor and Director of Research > Children's Learning Institute > University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston > > > -----Original Message----- > From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of joey > m > Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 9:52 AM > To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Draize scoring > > Hi all: > > Does someone know a paper (or any SAS reference) to check how to fit a > non-parametric analysis for Draize Scoring (a subjective evaluation of > sking > irritation; i.e. edema, erithema, etc; scale goes from 0 to 4; being 0 no > response, and 4 severe response; all scored at several time points on the > same animals). I would like to compare several groups against a control at > each time point. > > I believe a Wilcoxon test must do, but I will appreciate any suggestions. > > Nice day to all, > > Joey. >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page