LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2009, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:45:05 -0700
Reply-To:     "Richard A. DeVenezia" <rdevenezia@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Richard A. DeVenezia" <rdevenezia@GMAIL.COM>
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Subject:      Re: Multiple j= in title and footnote statements
Comments: To: sas-l@uga.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sep 18, 9:00 pm, evilpettingzo...@AOL.COM (Ken Borowiak) wrote: > All, > > In an effort to generate more than ten lines in title and footnotes > statements, I am exploring using multiple j= options within a single > statement. Consider the following: > > title j=l 'First title text' j=l 'Second title text' ; > footnote j=l 'First footnote text' j=l 'Second footnote text' ; > > ods rtf file='TF Justification.rtf' ; > > proc print data=sashelp.class ; > run ; > > ods rtf close ; > > The title displays the two sets of text ( on seperate lines ) in the order > in which they are specified. However, the footnote text is displayed in > *REVERSED* order. Can anyone provide any insight as to why the footnotes > are displayed in this manner?

It does seem unusual, and reverse stacking in the footnote also occurs in ODS PDF destination. Sounds like a feature and not an RTF bug.

Why is irrelevant since it is a feature :)

I typically use the JUSTIFY= option to print multiple lines of text in SAS/Graph, and its use is documented in the AXIS statement.

- Richard A. DeVenezia http://www.devenezia.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page