LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2009, week 5)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:55:05 -0400
Reply-To:     Kevin Viel <citam.sasl@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Kevin Viel <citam.sasl@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Interaction
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:58:01 -0400, Billy Thompson <bill.thompson@BROOKS.AF.MIL> wrote:

>Hopefully some of you stats ‘gurus’ can help me solve my problem. > >I have a project in which the PI is interested in the interaction effects >among certain variables and not the main effects. The problem results >that when I run the ‘full’ factorial model with all effects the >interaction effects are non significant and the main effects are >significant. If I then remove the significant main effects the >interaction effects then become significant. > >Is it appropriate to run the model with interaction effects only, thus >ignoring the main effects?

Shawn Haskell calls it the heredity principle(1), I call in a heirarchically well-formulated model.

(1) http://www.listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0810D&L=sas-l&P=R1693

One thing to establish is *why* you are running the model. What is the variable of interest? What does the science say the model should be?

Having diverted, I will say no; you should include lower order terms.

HTH,

Kevin Kevin


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page