LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2009, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:35:07 -0700
Reply-To:     VirtualSUG <sfbay0001@AOL.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         VirtualSUG <sfbay0001@AOL.COM>
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Subject:      Re: SAS certification necessary?
Comments: To: sas-l@uga.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Allow me to please share my 14.56 cents on this topic.

I have no doubt that some hiring authorities in some organizations are using "SAS Certication" (or the lack thereof) as a "weed out" tool to winnow down the number of candidates they might consider for a job. This is probably true for employment agencies and at internal HR departments who are tasked to apply a "first pass screen and flush" of applicants for a job.

In the current economic malaise there is probably more "SAS talent out on the street" than in better times. Even good candidates might find themselves out of consideration for jobs for which they are otherwise well qualified if the resume scanning software or human assigned to the "first look" of resumes is trained to "flush" or "delete" those where some variant of "SAS Certified" is not found.

In past SAS-L posts I have shared my thoughts on what I feel are the many limitations and drawbacks of the SAS Certified Professional program, and it's not necessary to repeat them here, except to say that hiring authorities who insist on "SAS Certification" as an employment requriement (or even a requirement for an interview) are probably overlooking otherwise highly qualified canddiates for jobs.

At the same time, however, I can sympathize with hiring managers and others who want to hire people who already have the SAS experience appropriate for the position they want to fill. As the number and range of SAS products increases, the definition of a "SAS user" is likewise changing. There is a big difference between somone who solely uses, say, the Enterprise Miner or Enterprise Guide, versus a candidate with many years of SAS data step and procedure step programming experience. The EM or EG user would probably not be well- qualified for a job where knowledge of "SAS coding" was required.

One of the big frustrations I've had expressed to me by non-technical (or just non-SAS-savvy) managers is trying to figure out what a candidate means when they say they "know SAS." From a purely intellectual level, no one person has a complete knowledge of all aspects/features of SAS (although I know a few people who probably come pretty close!) But, I have seen folks hired in to jobs on the strength of their assertion that they "used SAS in graduate school" or they "know SAS," only to fail miserably on the job because what they do know of the SAS System is not adequate or appropriate for the tasks at hand. It's not uncommon, for example, for folks who said they "learned SAS in graduate school" by running some analytic procedure steps to have no, or scant, knowlege of SAS programming features.

An obvious solution to this problem would be for hiring managers to devise their own assessment tools that test a candidate's knowledge of those aspects of SAS needed for a particular job. But, that process might be time consuming, and would be ineffective if the hiring authorities don't have a clue themselves what the job entails from a SAS Software tools perspective.

But, candidates (a/k/a "talent," in the parlance of the recruiting business) need to understand the benefits of networking and creating their own opportunities for "face time" with hiring managers outside the standard rubric of applying for publically advertised jobs. Just sending in resumes in response to postings on sites like DICE and MONSTER are probably not going to do the trick for you.

Thanks for taking my thoughts in to consideration...

Andrew Karp Sierra Information Services Virtual SAS Users Group www.sierrainformation.com www.virtualsug.org

On Jul 11, 1:18�am, shellp <coolchic...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > HI > > Just thought I'd reply that the Healthcare Analyst being certified may > not mean they are (or need to be) certified in SAS. �I work in the > Healthcare Field and certification may mean in terms of Health Records > data and being certified for that through AHIMA. > > Of course having SAS experience is helpful for the many databases > available to hospital/Ministry (I live in Canada) personnel. > > Shelley


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page