LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2009)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:37:07 -0700
Reply-To:   Bruce Weaver <bweaver@lakeheadu.ca>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Bruce Weaver <bweaver@lakeheadu.ca>
Subject:   Re: SPSS and IBM
In-Reply-To:   <A0E92108F6B743549A360EF53FD73AE2@NOTEBOOK>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hector Maletta wrote: > > A nimble company is being gulped down by a plodding beast. Being devoured > by > a dinosaur is not my idea of progress, or a sensible way of staying on > top. > Somebody in this thread suggested this is better than being acquired by > Microsoft: I doubt it. Whatever your opinion about MS, the Oakland guys > belong in a higher rung of the evolutionary ladder. > > > > Should we worry? Should we just worry or rather run for our lives? Should > I > start seriously studying SAS or Stata? > > > > Hector > > >

There have been many newsgroup & mailing list discussions of the relative merits of SPSS, SAS, and Stata over the years. But in many cases, folks just sing the praises of their favorite package, and cast aspersions at the competitors. And the criticisms of the other packages are often based on woeful ignorance of those packages. I think the technical report by the UCLA Statistical Consulting Group is a refreshing exception to that rule, however. As far as I can tell, it was complied by folks with some experience with all 3 packages, and with no particular axes to grind.

http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/technicalreports/ -- see report #1

I have Stata (v10), but thus far have not made the switch--i.e., I use Stata for things that it can do and SPSS cannot do (short of some kludgy work-around). My main reasons for not switching yet are:

1. Because of institutional decisions, I have to use SPSS in a course I teach. 2. Nearly all of my colleagues & collaborators use SPSS. 3. I have a lot of implicit knowledge of SPSS that would (to some degree) be chucked out the window if I switched.

Those reasons are not in any particular order. But, I suspect that if our institutions had site licenses and support for Stata comparable to those for SPSS, a lot more folks would consider switching.

----- -- Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM."

-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SPSS-and-IBM-tp24721802p24725106.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page