| Date: | Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:00:05 -0700 |
| Reply-To: | Dennis Fisher <dfisher@CSULB.EDU> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | Dennis Fisher <dfisher@CSULB.EDU> |
| Subject: | Re: PROC CLUSTER... slow |
|
| In-Reply-To: | <6eca73440906181039h72724e32k2f3735f76fe266c3@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Usually when you have that many observations you would use PROC FASTCLUS
instead.
Dennis G. Fisher, Ph.D.
Professor and Director
Center for Behavioral Research and Services
California State University, Long Beach
1090 Atlantic Avenue
Long Beach, CA 90813
tel: 562-495-2330 x121
fax: 562-983-1421
http://www.csulb.edu/centers/cbrs
-----Original Message-----
From: SAS(r) Discussion [mailto:SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of OR
Stats
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:40 AM
To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: PROC CLUSTER... slow
Hello: I have some 2,000 records for which I am running PROC CLUSTER on 7
variables. After almost a full 24h, it still was not done. I am running XP
with E5440 @ 2.83 GHz 2.83 GHz at 3.25 GB of RAM. Does anyone know why it
is so slow? Thx so much!!
|