| Date: | Fri, 3 Apr 2009 19:18:16 -0700 |
| Reply-To: | Jack Hamilton <jfh@STANFORDALUMNI.ORG> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | Jack Hamilton <jfh@STANFORDALUMNI.ORG> |
| Subject: | Re: SCL/AF |
|
| In-Reply-To: | <ed15da6e-3ee3-4be7-8410-ac5505435d85@c18g2000prh.googlegroups.com> |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes |
On Apr 3, 2009, at 6:40 pm, Savian wrote:
> I have never seen OpenOffice.org in the field so not sure if there is
> any market there.
I don't know if there's a market for OO.o itself - what I want is its
ability to read and write Microsoft Office files. If my understanding
is correct, it should be possible to run OO.o on Unix and create a
Excel or Word file - not XML that Office knows how to read, but an
actual binary-compatible file. And it should be possible to make a
programming interface available to the data step so that you could do
the equivalent of creating an Office document with .Net - but on a
Unix box, or even a mainframe.
The ExcelXP tagset is great, but it doesn't do everything I might
possibly want.
> I also don't see SAS tying themselves closer to Windows. Can you
> provide an example?
Enterprise Guide is available only for Windows - that's probably the
biggest example. Various programs in the BI suite are available only
for Windows (though I think some of them are cross-platform).
On the other hand, JMP is available for both Windows and Mac OS X, and
some iPhone apps were shown at SAS Global Forum.
--
Jack Hamilton
jfh@alumni.stanford.org
Videtis illam spirare libertatis auram
On Apr 3, 2009, at 6:40 pm, Savian wrote:
> On Apr 3, 4:42 pm, j...@STANFORDALUMNI.ORG (Jack Hamilton) wrote:
>> On Apr 2, 2009, at 9:32 am, Savian wrote:
>>
>>> New features in languages force rethinking on how to do a given
>>> problem. For example, C# 4.0 will now support more dynamic features
>>> due to pressure from Python developers who insisted on more dynamic
>>> syntax. The ease of use of Excel using .NET should put pressure on
>>> SAS
>>> to better support Office.
>>
>> What I would like is built-in support for OpenOffice.org, and in
>> particular an API that's called by ODS and callable explicitly in the
>> data step.
>>
>> SAS Institute is tying itself more and more to the Windows
>> architecture, and I don't think it's good in the long term to do
>> that. I would prefer them to stick to solutions that can be
>> implemented on multiple platforms, not just Windows.
>>
>> --
>> Jack Hamilton
>> j...@alumni.stanford.org
>> Videtis illam spirare libertatis auram
>
> Jack,
>
> I have never seen OpenOffice.org in the field so not sure if there is
> any market there.
>
> I also don't see SAS tying themselves closer to Windows. Can you
> provide an example?
>
> Microsoft is also doing a lot of things that cross platforms.
> Silverlight, for example, runs on multiple platforms including Mac,
> Linux, Windows and all major browsers.
>
> Alan
> Savian
|