LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2009, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:50:47 -0400
Reply-To:     Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Arthur Tabachneck <art297@NETSCAPE.NET>
Subject:      Re: Percentage Change
Comments: To: Andy Sasuser <sas9bi@GMAIL.COM>

If you are trying to state the percent change, or delta, then the 2nd calculation. BTW, it can be simplified to .6/.5-1

I.e., .6 is 20% greater than .5. In absolute terms it increased by .1 somethings.

Art -------- On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 16:06:26 -0500, sas 9 bi user <sas9bi@GMAIL.COM> wrote:

>All - > >Say the first measure has a result of 50% >Say the 2nd measure has a result of 60% > >One could say that there was a 10% percentage point increase from the old to >the new measurement - .6 - .5 = 10% > >One could also look at it like below: > >(.6 - .5 ) / .5 = 20% > >which nets 20% change old vs new. > >Which is the better one to use or can there be a valid argument for both? > >Best!


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page