LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2009)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:08:15 -0200
Reply-To:     Hector Maletta <hmaletta@fibertel.com.ar>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Hector Maletta <hmaletta@fibertel.com.ar>
Subject:      Re: comparing weighted data to unweighted data
Comments: To: J P <jp7837@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To:  <47927.62340.qm@web59902.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

Several consequences. First, if the weights were “inflationary”, i.e. they amplify sample size to the size of the population, SPSS would consider the expanded size as the size of the sample, and compute significance accordingly (thus overstating the significance of results). Besides, if different cases have different weights (i.e. weights are correcting proportions in the sample to proportions in the population), using the unweighted set gives some cases more weight than they deserve, and other cases less, again distorting the results.

I do not understand your remark about weights being no Langer achúrate because the data have been subsetted. If you have N cases, each with a weight, and you take one subset of M cases (M<N), you can still use the weights. For instance, súpose you extract a sample of 1000 from a population, with a complex sampling design mandating that each case has a specific weight in the sample; your weighted sample would yield results representative of the referente population. Then suppose you select one subset consisting of about one half of the samle (say, just all the males): if you keep the weights, your subset would represent the characteristics of the male population, just as the entire sample represented the entire population of both sexes.

Hector.

_____

From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of J P Sent: 26 February 2009 13:46 To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: comparing weighted data to unweighted data

Dear List,

I appreciate your patience with this non-SPSS question.

From a practical standpoint, what is the consequence of conducting a statistical test comparing means or frequencies when one data set is weighted and the other is not (data has been subsetted so weights are no longer accurate).

Thank you,

John


[text/html]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page