LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2009, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:31:11 -0500
Reply-To:   Peter Flom <peterflomconsulting@mindspring.com>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Peter Flom <peterflomconsulting@MINDSPRING.COM>
Subject:   Re: Graphical summaries of 3 level discriminants
Comments:   To: Murphy <goladin@gmail.com>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Murphy <goladin@gmail.com> wrote

>Hi Peter, > >I am not sure whether I am being correct here but I think you can manually create the ROC chart by calculating the number of correct hits against the misclassified. >

Hi Murphy

Thanks for your reply.

One could, indeed, calculate the number of correctly classified vs. misclassified, but with a 3 level discriminant it's problematic. Suppose the three levels are MARRIED, SINGLE, and OTHER. (These are not my categories, but they will do .... ).

One could compute the number of married people classifed as M vs. misclassified, the number of single people classified as S vs. misclassified, and the number of others classified as other vs. misclassifed. But then, what is a false positive, true positive, and so on? Wouldn't you have to have true married, false married, true single, false single, and so on? And, given that, what would specificity and sensitivity be?

Thanks again

Peter

Peter L. Flom, PhD Statistical Consultant www DOT peterflom DOT com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page