LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2008)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:59:56 +0100
Reply-To:     Marta García-Granero <mgarciagranero@gmail.com>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Marta García-Granero <mgarciagranero@gmail.com>
Subject:      Re: nested effects?
In-Reply-To:  <C9563A8511C9BB488B41E541ACC749F983772FE7DC@PITT-EXCH-07.univ.pitt.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Zdaniuk, Bozena wrote: > Ok, I get it (or so I hope:)). Now, the reason I asked was because I was trying to get around dyad problem. > I have caregiver-care recipient dyads that were randomly assigned to treatment or control and I measure them on five outcomes. Pearson correlation tells me that on two outcomes correlation between CG and CR score is significant. According to Kenny, I have no choice but to analyze at the level of dyad. But I was still hoping to analyze on the level of individuals to retain more power. So, I thought I would include a dyad id as random factor nested in the treatment and this way I can say that I remove the impact of dyad from the treatment effect. But it looks like I cannot do it because my individuals are not randomly assigned to dyads, right? > Your design is not nested at all, but paired. Against your idea, if the correlation between CG&CR score is significant, analyzing your data using dyad as unit retains more power than treating your individuals independently. Paired designs are very efficient since they remove inter-pair heterogeneity. Just as a small proof: if you compute the sample size you need to detect a standardized effect d=0.8 (Cohen's threshold for large effects) as significant with a power of 80% in 2 independent samples design, you end up with 25 subjects per group. The same calculation in a paired design will give you a figure close to 15 pairs. Therefore, a paired design is more efficient.

HTH, Marta

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page