Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:36:10 -0000
Reply-To: Garry Gelade <garry@business-analytic.co.uk>
Sender: "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Garry Gelade <garry@business-analytic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Interpreting MANOVA Results
In-Reply-To: <1c619a5e0811252250m5ba32102i4d1c434e04ab0003@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
The answer to your second question is that the protection against Type I
error comes from the significance test for the initial MANOVA. You would
only run individual ANOVA for each IV if the initial MANOVA is significant.
Garry Gelade
Business Analytic Ltd
-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of
Swetal Sindhvad
Sent: 26 November 2008 06:51
To: SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Interpreting MANOVA Results
Hi,
Can anyone shed some light on SPSS Manova results? What are the main
elements to be looked at along with significance of F statistic?
Also, why would one run individual ANOVA for each independent variable as a
follow up analysis? Isn't the objective of MANOVA to reduce type I error?
Thank you!
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of
commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
__________ NOD32 3641 (20081126) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
LISTSERV@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD