LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2008, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:56:39 -0500
Reply-To:   "./ ADD NAME=Data _null_," <iebupdte@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   "./ ADD NAME=Data _null_," <iebupdte@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:   Re: OT: watch out for the two date systems of Excel
Comments:   To: Walter Scott <Walter.Scott@state.tn.us>
In-Reply-To:   <48A2DF59.56C4.0017.0@state.tn.us>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 8/13/08, Walter Scott <Walter.Scott@state.tn.us> wrote: > So, MS didn't replicate Lotus' date numbering exactly; they added the bug that 0 is translated to 0-Jan-1900.

It can't be a bug if it's a MicroSoft product. :-D --

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page
listserv.uga.edu
Enterprise Information Technology Services
The University of Georgia
listhelp@uga.edu